The Supreme Court of India has cleared the way for NTA(National Testing Agency) to announce NEETUG result, by staying a recent Bombay High Court Order when had directed the agency to hold the exam again for two undergraduate medical aspirants. Exam was held on 12th September 2021, Sunday. 16 lakh aspirants appeared for NEET medical entrance.
#neet #neetresult #neetugresult #supremecourt #mbbs #mbbsarboadinukraine #bfasofficial #neetresul2021 #brightfutureas
The Supreme Court on Monday heard a plea seeking ex-gratia monetary compensation of Rs 4 lakh or notified ex-gratia monetary compensation to the families of deceased, who have succumbed to the Covid-19 pandemicSenior Advocate S.B.
Upadhyay appeared for the petitioner before the bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice M.R.
He submitted, “We are seeking that giving effect to Section 12, a certificate needs to be issued that death is due to COVID-19… there are cases, where the bodies are being taken from mortuary to cremation ground.
There needs to be a certificate.
There is a letter of March 14, 2020, which says to give benefit under the NDMA Act, the disaster has to be natural one.
COVID was notified as a disaster,” he added.Read More...
Facebook these days printed the first 20 participants of its Oversight Board, an impartial physique that can pass by judgement on Facebook‘s policies, aid in content material moderation, and hear appeals on current decisions.
In theory, it’s a committee that can assist Facebook navigate hard selections of what’s ok to have on the platform, and can overrule even CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
It’ll additionally be funded by way of an impartial $130 million trust.
The board will hear instances in five-person panels and make closing rulings, announcing on its website online that “Facebook have to put in force our decisions, until implementation should violate the law.”Zuckerberg stated in 2018 that the unbiased board would “be centered solely on our community,” adding: “The reason of this physique would be to uphold the precept of giving human beings a voice whilst additionally recognizing the truth of maintaining human beings safe.”In an op-ed for the New York Times, the 4 co-chairs of the board specify that they won’t always be managing each and every attraction or coverage choice to do with Facebook:We will center of attention on figuring out instances that have a real-world impact, are essential for public discourse and increase questions about modern Facebook policies.
But, whilst they don’t say it in so many words, one may want to infer they don’t suppose Facebook should be tons worse off for their assist than it is now.The human beings who’ve as a result a long way been chosen to be on the board have a plethora of tiers and skills that make them perfect for judging subtle social situations.
They consist of the former Prime Minister of Denmark, Nobel Peace Prize and Pulitzer recipients, contributors of worldwide advocacy groups, and more than one regulation professors.