Many people are asking this question in the wake of the Supreme Court's recent verdict on the Ayodhya case. While the Court's decision was welcomed by many, others feel it did not go far enough.
If you are one of those people, don't worry – you are not alone. There is a lot of anger among those who feel that the Court did not do justice. Many call for a review of the judgment, and some demand that the Court reconsiders the case.
So what can you do if unsatisfied with the Supreme Court judgements? Well, there are a few options open to you. You can protest, you can petition the government, or you can take legal action. However, it is important to remember that none of these options will be easy, and they all come with challenges.
Overview of Supreme Court Judgment
The Supreme Court of India has issued Latest Supreme Court judgments in the case of Aadhaar. The unanimous verdict of the five-judge Constitution bench upholds the constitutional validity of Aadhaar with some modifications. The judgment, penned by Justice AK Sikri, strikes down section 57 of the Aadhaar Act, which allowed corporates and individuals to demand an Aadhaar to establish identity.
You may be wondering what this means for you. Here's a quick overview. If you have an Aadhaar card, your biometric data will still be retained by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). However, you will no longer be required to produce your Aadhaar card for verification purposes. You are free to continue using your Aadhaar card if you wish to, or you can update your KYC details using other documents such as a passport, voter ID, or driving license.
So far, so good. But what if you are not satisfied with this judgment? What are your options?
How to Challenge the Supreme Court Judgment?
If you are unsatisfied with the Supreme Court judgment, you can challenge it by filing a review petition.
You can file a review petition in the Supreme Court within 90 days of the judgment. You must show that the judgment is wrong and needs to be overturned. The Court will only hear arguments from the petitioner, not the respondent.
The petitioner has to convince the Court that the judgment is wrong and should be overturned. The Court will not grant a stay on the judgment and will not suspend the execution of the order.
What Is the Procedure for Filing a Review Petition Against the Supreme Court's Judgment?
If you are not satisfied with the Latest Supreme Court rulings, there is a procedure for filing a review petition.
You can file a review petition in the following way:
1. You must first file a petition in the High Court concerned.
2. You must show that you have a substantial interest in the matter and are affected by the judgment.
3. The High Court will then decide if it will hear your case.
4. If the High Court hears your case, it will decide if your petition is meritorious.
5. If the High Court decides that your petition is meritorious, it will refer the matter to the Supreme Court for reconsideration.
Rights and Responsibilities for People Impacted by the Indian Supreme Court Judgment
If you are unsatisfied with the Indian Supreme Court judgment, it's important to understand your rights and responsibilities. The most important thing is to be informed about your options.
You have the right to appeal a Supreme Court decisions, although this may not always be possible in practice due to the cost and complexity associated with appealing a court ruling. Additionally, you may have the right to file a petition for review if specific conditions are met.
On the responsibility side of things, you need to ensure that you actively engage with the judicial process if you exercise your right to appeal or file a petition for review. This means you must be prepared and organized to present your case effectively, so ensure all relevant information is collected before beginning this process.
So what do you do if you're unhappy with the Supreme Court judgment? Well, you could try and change the law.
You could also try and change the people who make the law. You could vote for people you think will make better laws, or you could try and get involved with the process yourself.
Or, you could accept the recent judgement of Supreme Court and try and work within the parameters that have been set. After all, the Supreme Court is made up of people who are fallible. They may not always get it right, but they're our best shot at getting a fair and just judgment.
The Supreme Court dismissed the bail application of a petitioner, who is an Officer of the office of the Alipore District Judge’s Court, accused of floating a tender without the permission of the District Judge.
During the investigation, it has been found that there were no supplies but entries were affected in the documents of the office.
The Counsel, appearing for the State of West Bengal, opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is not cooperating with the investigation.
Whereas the Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that he needs time to file a rejoinder.Read More....
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has ordered the abolishment of the Nasla Tower in Karachi, a building constructed on government-owned during, a hearing on Wednesday.تازہ ترین خبریںThe court also directed authorities to clear all government-owned lands in Karachi of encroachments and submit a report within three months.During the proceedings, a senior member of the Board of Revenue told the court that a survey of government-owned land is underway, which will be completed within six months.Expressing anger over the slow pace of work, the Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed said that Karachi and Sindh have been "destroyed.
"He said that the court needs an accurate record from the survey, adding that the incumbent authorities have made a mess of the situation while the revenue department "seems to be busy minting money".The Chief Justice remarked that Karachi "does not even have a master plan", noting that areas like Malir and Korangi have many illegally constructed high-rise buildings.He said that if the land records are not computerised with immediate effect, action will be taken against those responsible at the Board of Revenue.In response, a senior member of the Board of Revenue said that the board has so far complied with all orders of the court.In response, the Chief Justice said the court will see which orders have been implemented.
"If not, you will be the first one to lose your position," the top judge warned the representative.FIRs to be registered against leaseholders in Karachi: Chief JusticeAnother case, related to encroachments along Karachi's Gujjar nullah, was also heard in the Supreme Court.In his remarks, the Chief Justice said that first information reports (FIRs) would be registered by police against those involved in leasing lands in Karachi and this will be the first step in holding the responsible to account.The Administrator of the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) Laeeq Ahmed also appeared before the court and said that an operation has been launched against encroachments on the nullah, adding that there is difficulty in demolishing buildings and there is a shortage of funds as considerable sums have been spent on demolishment.Irked by the response, the Chief Justice said KMC has been rendered useless, adding that 80% of the staffers ought to be fired as they do not seem to do any work and just sit in the office the entire day.
