Advocate For Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has ordered the abolishment of the Nasla Tower in Karachi, a building constructed on government-owned during, a hearing on Wednesday.تازہ ترین خبریںThe court also directed authorities to clear all government-owned lands in Karachi of encroachments and submit a report within three months.During the proceedings, a senior member of the Board of Revenue told the court that a survey of government-owned land is underway, which will be completed within six months.Expressing anger over the slow pace of work, the Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed said that Karachi and Sindh have been "destroyed.

"He said that the court needs an accurate record from the survey, adding that the incumbent authorities have made a mess of the situation while the revenue department "seems to be busy minting money".The Chief Justice remarked that Karachi "does not even have a master plan", noting that areas like Malir and Korangi have many illegally constructed high-rise buildings.He said that if the land records are not computerised with immediate effect, action will be taken against those responsible at the Board of Revenue.In response, a senior member of the Board of Revenue said that the board has so far complied with all orders of the court.In response, the Chief Justice said the court will see which orders have been implemented.

"If not, you will be the first one to lose your position," the top judge warned the representative.FIRs to be registered against leaseholders in Karachi: Chief JusticeAnother case, related to encroachments along Karachi's Gujjar nullah, was also heard in the Supreme Court.In his remarks, the Chief Justice said that first information reports (FIRs) would be registered by police against those involved in leasing lands in Karachi and this will be the first step in holding the responsible to account.The Administrator of the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) Laeeq Ahmed also appeared before the court and said that an operation has been launched against encroachments on the nullah, adding that there is difficulty in demolishing buildings and there is a shortage of funds as considerable sums have been spent on demolishment.Irked by the response, the Chief Justice said KMC has been rendered useless, adding that 80% of the staffers ought to be fired as they do not seem to do any work and just sit in the office the entire day.

Kidnapping has been codified as a criminal offence under the Indian Penal Code,1860.

Kidnapping has been given a wider connotation as meaning carrying away of a human being against his or her consent or the consent of some other person legally authorized to give consent on behalf of such person.

Section 360 [Kidnapping from India]

As per Section 360 Kidnapping from India means,

“Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of some person legally authorized to consent on behalf of that person is said to kidnap that person from India.”

Section 361 [Kidnapping from Lawful Guardianship]

Divorce lawyer in Dwarka - Hire the best law firms, advocates for District Court, High Court & Supreme Court in Delhi and get legal advice in Dwarka New Delhi India.

The Supreme Court in its direction largely placed the responsibility on states and union territories in facilitating the return of the migrant laborers.

Facebook these days printed the first 20 participants of its Oversight Board, an impartial physique that can pass by judgement on Facebook‘s policies, aid in content material moderation, and hear appeals on current decisions.

In theory, it’s a committee that can assist Facebook navigate hard selections of what’s ok to have on the platform, and can overrule even CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

It’ll additionally be funded by way of an impartial $130 million trust.

The board will hear instances in five-person panels and make closing rulings, announcing on its website online that “Facebook have to put in force our decisions, until implementation should violate the law.”Zuckerberg stated in 2018 that the unbiased board would “be centered solely on our community,” adding: “The reason of this physique would be to uphold the precept of giving human beings a voice whilst additionally recognizing the truth of maintaining human beings safe.”In an op-ed for the New York Times, the 4 co-chairs of the board specify that they won’t always be managing each and every attraction or coverage choice to do with Facebook:We will center of attention on figuring out instances that have a real-world impact, are essential for public discourse and increase questions about modern Facebook policies.

But, whilst they don’t say it in so many words, one may want to infer they don’t suppose Facebook should be tons worse off for their assist than it is now.The human beings who’ve as a result a long way been chosen to be on the board have a plethora of tiers and skills that make them perfect for judging subtle social situations.

They consist of the former Prime Minister of Denmark, Nobel Peace Prize and Pulitzer recipients, contributors of worldwide advocacy groups, and more than one regulation professors.

Direct selling company QNet has had its fair share of trouble in India in recent years.

The allegations range from cheating to being in violation of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation(Banning) Act (PCMC Act).

QNet has spoken out strongly against these allegations and insisted that it is a legitimate direct selling company.

Till recently, there was no recognized nodal authority for this industry and till date, there is no legislation to govern or regulate this business.

Despite these challenges, a report from the World Federation of Direct Selling Associations shows that India generated over USD 1 billion in revenues through the direct selling sector in 2017.

Ltd is not a money circulation scheme as alleged and does not fall under the purview of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation (Banning) Act 1978.


Qnet India got a breather is the latest court order. Direct selling company QNet has had its fair share of trouble in India in recent years. Quite a few news articles in most major publications refer to various investigations and legal challenges faced by the company.