Sign in

When to Opt for Manual and Automation Testing

Brett Smith
When to Opt for Manual and Automation Testing

Why do businesses need a practical testing approach? Effective software testing strategies help maintain competitiveness and meet user expectations. It ensures the delivery of top-notch products. Many organizations face the dilemma of choosing between two methodologies: manual and automated testing.

As per Gartner, 60% of respondents said improving product quality was among their organization’s reasons to automate software testing in 2023.

Understanding Manual Testing: The Art of Human Insight

Manual testing involves testers identifying software or application quality without the help of automated tests and scripts. Testers help detect bugs and defects affecting end-users. Even in automation testing manual testing remains essential to examine the feasibility of initial checks for automation.

When to Opt for Manual Testing:

Choosing manual testing is akin to bringing in a skilled detective when you need intuition, creativity, and a hands-on approach. It shines in exploratory testing, unravelling the intricacies of complex user interfaces, and navigating the ever-changing landscapes of early development stages. Picture it as the swift and cost-effective solution for small projects or urgent deployments, where the human touch is invaluable, offering a tailored approach that automated scripts might miss. For small projects or when an immediate deployment is needed, manual testing can be more cost-effective as it doesn’t require the initial setup time and cost associated with automated testing.

Transitioning to Automation Testing: The Power of Efficiency

Automation testing involves using specialized tools to execute pre-scripted tests on a software application automatically. It’s like setting up an assembly line in a factory, where repetitive tasks are automated for efficiency.

When to Opt for Automation Testing:

Opt for automation testing when repetitive tests need to be executed quickly, extensive test coverage is required, and frequent regression testing is necessary. Automation is beneficial for load and performance testing, scenarios with large datasets, and when testing across multiple configurations. It is particularly effective in agile and continuous integration environments to ensure faster feedback and reliable software delivery. In the case of long-term projects, though the initial investment is higher, automated testing proves to be cost-effective in the long run due to reduced testing times and increased efficiency.

Blending Manual and Automated Testing: Best of Both Worlds

The most effective approach often lies in a blend of both manual and automated testing. The synergy of human insight and automated efficiency can yield the best results.

Hybrid Approach: Using automated testing for

Repetitive and high-volume tests, while relying on manual testing for exploratory, ad-hoc, and complex UI testing can provide a comprehensive testing strategy. This approach ensures both efficiency and quality.

Phased Automation: Gradually introducing automation in areas that benefit the most from it, while keeping other areas manual, can be a practical approach for many organizations. This allows for a careful evaluation of the benefits and ROI of automation.

Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): In a CI/CD environment, automation testing is vital for quick deployments. However, manual testing still plays a role in the final stages of the pipeline to ensure that the product aligns with user expectations and business goals.

Choosing the Right Software Testing Services:

When selecting a software testing services, consider their expertise in both manual and automated testing. Look for a service provider who understands your specific needs and can offer a tailored testing strategy that combines the best of both worlds. A partner who stays abreast of the latest trends and tools in both manual and automated testing can provide a competitive edge, ensuring your software stands out in terms of quality and reliability.

Remember, in the dynamic world of software development, flexibility and adaptability in your testing approach can make all the difference. Choose a software testing service that aligns with your vision and is committed to helping you navigate the complexities of software testing, ensuring your product’s success in the marketplace.

Automation Testing Tools -



Katalon Studio


Tricentis Tosca


Robot Framework


Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing


Deciding when to opt for manual or automated testing is not a one-size-fits-all solution. It largely depends on various factors like project size, complexity, budget, and timelines. While automation offers speed and efficiency, manual testing brings in the human element that is crucial for certain types of testing.

The key lies in understanding the strengths and limitations of each method and strategically combining them for the best outcome. Ultimately, the goal of any software testing service should be to ensure a high-quality, reliable, and user-friendly product, whether through manual efforts, automation, or a blend of both.

Brett Smith
Zupyak is the world’s largest content marketing community, with over 400 000 members and 3 million articles. Explore and get your content discovered.
Read more