What is stated in the Writ of Execution?

The Supreme Court dismissed the bail application of a petitioner, who is an Officer of the office of the Alipore District Judge’s Court, accused of floating a tender without the permission of the District Judge.

During the investigation, it has been found that there were no supplies but entries were affected in the documents of the office.

The Counsel, appearing for the State of West Bengal, opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is not cooperating with the investigation.

Whereas the Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that he needs time to file a rejoinder.Read More....

The Madras High Court convicted two Advocates guilty of contempt of court on Friday for pursuing vexatious litigation’ to remove a Registrar (Vigilance) by filing a false affidavit accusing her of holding the office without the necessary qualifications.Furthermore, the Court voiced reservations about the plea being published in media outlets before the High Court had an opportunity to rule on it.

The Court stated that such conduct by the concerned lawyers undermines the judiciary’s reputation in the eyes of the public. 

Philadelphia Slip and Fall Lawyer adept in calculating the exact amount of damage and accordingly represent the case in court.

One of the most trending topics that have the people in India worried, is the talk about social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram being banned by the Government.Is this in fact true?

Is the Indian Government really going to take away the platforms which have proven to be a source of income for some, a source of entertainment, and a platform to connect to others?These are the questions that have the people of India quite worked up and worried.However, this doesn’t actually seem to be the case.

It is true, that these platforms, like WhatsApp, are going up against the Indian Government, but there has been no indication by the Indian Government for banning these platforms.What actually happened?About three months back, the Indian Government had issued new digital rules to be followed by platforms like WhatsApp, Twitter, and Facebook.

The terms of the new rules were something along the lines of:They are required to appoint a compliance officer in India.They are required to set up a grievance response mechanism.They are required to take down content within 36 hours of a legal order.They are required to use automated processes to take down offensive content.The government had given these firms till the 26th of May to comply with these rules, failure to do so would take away their protection from lawsuits and prosecutions.

According to the Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code, this would mean that these “significant social media intermediaries” or sites that are a host to a number of third-party posts, messages, and information, would not be allowed to claim legal immunity from the content posted on their sites.In light of these new rules, Google, to ensure the Indian Government of its continuous efforts to comply with the legal formalities, cited their “long history” of content that they have managed in accordance with a number of local laws.Facebook responded by saying that they “aim to comply” with the rules but at the same time they’ve asked to first discuss a few things that need to be addressed.Twitter on the other hand hasn’t responded to these new digital rules as it is currently already preoccupied being on the radar of the government and Delhi police for its “congress toolkit” tweet controversy.Sites like Koo, having around 6 million users, complied with the new rules last week itself.WhatsApp, the messaging service owned by Facebook, having nearly 400 million users in India filed a petition against the Indian Government on Tuesday.

The company said that the new digital laws put forward by the government would compel the company to violate the privacy of its users.The company made a statement saying, “Requiring messaging apps to ‘trace’ chats is the equivalent of asking us to keep a fingerprint of every single message sent on WhatsApp, which would break end-to-end encryption and fundamentally undermines people’s right to privacy.”WhatsApp has strongly argued against the traceability of messages, as in order to do so would require them to break their encryption of people sending and receiving messages.

The BCI notice additionally makes arrangements for the arrangement of such educators, who might give guidance.

The instructors consequently selected will be enough prepared, knowledgeable, and ought to have an expert foundation with the end goal that he/she ought to be a legal advisor, having experience of at any rate 10 years, in both hypothetical and pragmatic parts of this field.

Additionally, LLM researchers, having a particular degree in the field of intercession and assuagement can likewise be liked.The BCI delineated a 45-hour intercession part in the LLB course, wherein understudies would be instructed about different features, utilities, and elements of intervention and pacification.

The warning additionally went on about specific preparing programs in an intervention that would be given o instructors and academicians by the Bar Council itself.

#kanoonsangrah #delhihighcourt #delhi #government #courtPlease visit to know more about us:-https://kanoonsangrah.com/

Are you stuck with a court case?

It is a jeopardy that you need to handle with care.

Court Process Server helps you manage the court activities like personalized hand-delivery of documents like the summons, subpoenas and other legal orders.

On Monday, a group of pro-abortion advocates and providers asked the Supreme Court to block a controversial law in Texas banning abortions after 6 weeks of pregnancy.

The law is set to take effect on Wednesday.

The abortion-rights groups warned that it would be one of the most restrictive and prohibit nearly all abortions in the state if allowed to go forward.

The measure also allows private citizens to bring civil lawsuits against anyone who provides an abortion after six weeks or helps a woman access such procedures, such as a friend who drives a woman to obtain an abortion.

Those found to be in violation of the Texas law are required to pay at least $10 thousand to the person who successfully brought the suit Read more...