Sign in

Crowdsourced Testing Vs Automation Testing

Crowdsourced Testing Vs Automation Testing

Crowdsourced testing is an innovative way to reap the benefits of crowdsourcing and cloud platforms. It enlists the services of a community of testers, who collaborate online to test an application in addition to already existing testing processes of an organization. Crowdsourced testing involves leveraging on benefits of having a heterogeneous mix of people using diverse testing environments, which results in low cost, efficient and fast testing process.

Automation, on the other hand, achieves precision and speed that is difficult to match. Furthermore, integration with a CI/CD is easy with automation. However, automation, although efficient, does not have the creativity and vision of humans.

Human supervision and intervention cannot be completely excluded from the testing process. And there may be scenarios where in-house resources are scarce and organizations look for suitable alternatives like Crowdsourcing as it is easier to adapt to modified test cases.

In our previous article we talked about how  crowdsourcing is different from manual testing approach . We will now examine how  Crowdsourced testing  is different from the automation testing approach

Crowdsourced TestingAutomation TestingScalability HighHigh Re-run Cost HighLow  Device Coverage  HighHigh  Localization testing  HighLow Varied End user testing  HighLow Quality of Testing Medium High Execution Speed ​​MediumFast Cost of Testing LowHigh  Test Case Content Very detailedTo the point Adaptability to change in test cases HighLess Support for  Exploratory Testing YesNo Need for proficiency in programming  NoYes Confidentiality issues YesNone  Fraud Tracking Thorough auditsNot required 



Both types of testing, ie Automation and Crowdsourced, have their own range of benefits at the same time they pose certain challenges as well.

Initial cost of setting up an automated process for testing acts as a deterrent to many cost conscious organizations. However, it does prove beneficial in the long term, especially with CI/CD. It is important to identify and choose the right automation tool for long-term benefits.

Crowdsourced testing is a powerful approach which harnesses the power of crowd talent and wisdom. It offers different values ​​compared to manual and automation testing. It scales as compared to manual testing and is more flexible than automation testing. However, it comes with some challenges and for a better understanding of how Webomates handles them, read “ Overcoming the challenges of crowdsourced testing ” on our website.


The ideal approach for any kind of in-depth testing is to strike a balance between various approaches and create a comprehensive testing ecosystem. By combining manual, automation and crowdsourced testing, organizations can achieve higher quality, faster overall execution time and the highest quality of defects can be detected.

Webomates  offers a regression testing service that uses  crowdsource ,  manual  ,  automation  and artificial intelligence testing together to guarantee all test cases (even modified ones) are executed in  24 hours  with exploratory testing, generating a list of prioritized defects for software teams to review and fix .

If you are interested in learning more about the services offered by Webomates then please  click here  and schedule a demo, or reach out to us at  [email protected] You can also avail a free trial by clicking  here .

Read next

Api testing

Shift left testing

DevOps testing

Intelligent test automation

OTT media testing services

Requirement traceability

Black box testing

Regression testing

Software Testing Life Cycle

Test Automation vs. Manual Testing

Selenium Testing Automation

Exploratory testing in software testing

Zupyak is the world’s largest content marketing community, with over 400 000 members and 3 million articles. Explore and get your content discovered.
Read more